Stephen King Teams Up With Marvel to Revisit the DarkTower!

Excellent news!


New Comic Series Exploring the Origin of the Notorious Gunslinger Character Marks First Time Stephen King Has Produced Original Content for the Comic Book Format.
Marvel Comics to Launch First Issue in April 2006.

NEW YORK – World Fantasy Award-winning writer Stephen King, long acknowledged as the master of modern horror, and Marvel Comics join forces this spring to launch a ground-breaking new comic book series adapted from King’s magnum opus, The Dark Tower.

The comic series will mark the first time Stephen King has produced original content for an ongoing comic book project. The series will expand the saga of King’s epic hero, Roland Deschain, whose quest to save the Dark Tower is captured in seven best-selling novels published over the course of twenty-five years. King’s unparalleled storytelling power will inform new stories that delve into the life and times of the young Roland, revealing the trials and conflicts that lead to the burden of destiny he must assume as a man, the last Gunslinger from a world that has moved on. The comics will work in conjunction with the novels, further supplementing and defining the saga’s mythology under the direction of the acclaimed author himself.

“As a lifelong fan of Marvel comic books, and as an adult reader who’s seen comics “come of age” and take their rightful place in the world of fantasy and science fiction, I’m excited to be a part of Roland’s new incarnation,” said Stephen King.

The series will be illustrated by Eisner-award winning artist Jae Lee.

King continued, “I love Jae Lee’s work, and I think this is going to be a dynamite partnership. Frankly, I can’t wait.”

The first issue is scheduled to debut in April, 2006 with a hard cover collection of the first 6 issues released Holiday, 2006. Fans will start seeing promotional items – which feature more info in the series – beginning this December. Watch for more info as it becomes available at”



Ready for Another Peter Jackson – XMas Present? Kong – 3 hrs long!

A Big Gorilla Weighs In

LOS ANGELES, Oct. 26 – In hiring Peter Jackson, the Oscar-winning director of the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy, to remake the monster classic “King Kong,” Universal Pictures took a daring leap, paying him $20 million to direct, produce and be the co-writer of the film.

With seven weeks to go before the movie’s release, the risks are becoming clearer. After seeing a version of the film in late September at Mr. Jackson’s studio in New Zealand, Universal executives agreed to release “King Kong” at a length of three hours.

The film is substantially longer than Universal had anticipated and presents dual obstacles: the extra length has helped increase the budget by a third, to $207 million, while requiring the studio, owned by General Electric, to reach for the kind of long-term audience interest that made hits out of three-hour movies like “Titanic” and the films in Mr. Jackson’s “Rings” trilogy.

Hollywood blockbusters have increasingly relied on big releases that bring in as much as half of their ticket sales on the first weekend. But long films receive far fewer showings per day, and the most successful ones, like “Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring” (2001) by Mr. Jackson, which took in $315 million at the domestic box office for New Line Cinema, have remained in theaters for well over half a year.

The film industry and Universal could use a big seller.

Hollywood has been struggling this year at the box office, with overall revenue down more than half a billion dollars, about 8 percent, from last year’s total, according to Box Office Mojo, an online tracking service. Industry experts attribute the decline to a migration of audiences to other forms of electronic entertainment, whether television, DVD’s, video games or the Internet. Universal has had a mediocre year at the box office. The studio had a hit in the summer with the comedy “The 40-Year-Old Virgin,” but has endured disappointments, like the drama “Cinderella Man,” and has had lackluster results with films like “The Perfect Man,” “Kicking and Screaming” and “Doom,” which opened last week to a tepid $15 million.

Asked about the length of “King Kong,” Universal executives said they saw it as an advantage in an era when jaded moviegoers are hungering for something extraordinary.

“This is a three-hour feast of an event,” said Marc Shmuger, vice chairman of Universal Pictures, who described the film as a tragic love story between the ape and Naomi Watts, who plays Ann Darrow, an actress. “I’ve never come close to seeing an artist working at this level.”

Set for release on Dec. 14, “King Kong” retells the classic beauty-and-the-beast tale first filmed in 1933, with its lasting image of Kong atop the Empire State Building, and remade in 1976. Along with Ms. Watts, it stars Jack Black, Adrien Brody and a 25-foot, computer-animated gorilla.

This time around, the picture depends upon another oversize talent in the person of Mr. Jackson, who was granted an unusual degree of control at a time when studios are trimming costs and tightening their grips on most productions. Not only did Mr. Jackson produce and direct, and also write with his longtime partner, Fran Walsh, and Philippa Boyens, but his companies Weta Digital and Weta Workshop also created the physical and computer special effects in the film at Mr. Jackson’s studio in New Zealand.

Twentieth Century Fox and Paramount took a risk in granting the director James Cameron a similar degree of control over his famously overbudget 1997 film “Titanic,” and eventually came up winners. In that case, Mr. Cameron’s three-hour epic, a love story set in the midst of the ship’s sinking, went on to break box-office records and win 11 Oscars. With “King Kong,” Universal executives say they are convinced that they have an epic of comparable worth, even though they were surprised by the length.

“I anticipated it would be long, but not this long,” the Universal chairwoman, Stacey Snider, said. As recently as late September, she expected about two hours and 40 minutes, she said. But on Wednesday she expressed delight with the picture she’s got: “This is a masterpiece. I can’t wait to unveil it.”

The increased length, Ms. Snider said, means that the movie will cost $32 million more than planned, adding to expenses that had already gone up $25 million from an original $150 million production budget.

Who will pay for these budget overruns has been the subject of intense negotiations over the last two weeks, with representatives of the studio and the director haggling over who was responsible, according to those involved in the negotiations.

Ms. Snider said that as of Wednesday, all had been resolved, with the studio more or less splitting the $32 million expense with Mr. Jackson.

In an e-mail message, Mr. Jackson appeared to disagree, saying instead that he would be paying for those expenditures, which were mainly associated with extra digital-effects shots. Referring to his partner, Ms. Walsh, Mr. Jackson wrote: “Since Fran and I believed in the three-hour cut and wanted to take responsibility for the extra length, we offered to pay for these extra shots ourselves. That’s what we’re doing.” He did not say how much that would be, but said the extra effects shot would cost “considerably below $32 million.”

A spokesman for Universal responded, “We are working together to cover overages.”

In granting Mr. Jackson immense latitude, Universal relied not just on his skills, but also a huge fan base, much of which has followed the production through the director’s frequent communications on a Web site,

But few elements of the film have been seen by the larger public, and even Universal executives saw a finished version of King Kong’s face – with its expressive eyes, broadly fierce nose and mane of computer-generated hair – only in recent days.

Universal lost an opportunity to capitalize on a “Kong” revenue stream when an anticipated deal to release the film on Imax screens in December, at the same time the movie would appear in regular theaters, failed to materialize, and Imax chose to show Warner Brothers’ new “Harry Potter” film, “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.”

“We think ‘King Kong’ will be a big movie,” Richard L. Gelfond, co-chairman of Imax, said, “but unfortunately we could not agree on deal terms, including the box-office split.”

Ms. Snider said Imax could not guarantee space in its theaters at the time of Kong’s release, and acknowledged that both the studio and Mr. Jackson were disappointed.

A spokeswoman for NBC Universal said Bob Wright, the chairman, has been told of the rising cost and length of “King Kong.” “Bob is more than aware of what is going on with this production and other major productions, and he has enormous confidence in the leadership team at Universal Studios,” said the spokeswoman, Anna Perez.

Ms. Snider said she did not think the three-hour length would be an obstacle for moviegoers. Three-hour epics, she said, are Mr. Jackson’s “brand.”

Exhibitors have long complained that very long films make it harder to draw audiences, though in this difficult year at the box office, they have complained louder about not having enough good films to show. Paul Dergarabedian, president of Exhibitor Relations, which tracks the box office for theater owners, agreed that long movies posed problems. “But if it’s a really fine film, it won’t be a detriment to its success,” he said.

Brint it on!

Useless Observation of the Day…

…my new PC has no floppy drives. That makes me feel old.

New PC!!!

Oh and forgot to mention I picked up a new desktop PC. Wow – prices sure have dropped on these suckers. We now have a P4 2GHz unit with mulitple USB ports – some at the front, yay no more plugging the iPod in the back! The old PC, a PII – 450, cost me over 2500 Cdn. This new one cost just over $500! Again, Wow! BTW did I mention it has a dual layer DVD burner, very cool! We are happy and very fast now!

Terminal Review

My review of Brian Keene’s

is up at Horror Reader.

Great book.

Home PC Died!

Well its an old PII ~ 5 years old – prehistoric in computer terms. Not sure if it was caused by a virus but I suspect it was.

Anyhow, great excuse to upgrade but for now it means trips to the library to get on the web.:-(

I Knew It!

The Fool Card
You are the Fool card. The Fool fearlessly begins
the journey into the unknown. To do this, he
does not regard the world he knows as firm and
fixed. He has a seemingly reckless disregard
for obstacles. In the Ryder-Waite deck, he is
seen stepping off a cliff with his gaze on the
sky, and a rainbow is there to catch him. In
order to explore and expand, one must disregard
convention and conformity. Those in the throes
of convention look at the unconventional,
non-conformist personality and think What a
fool. They lack the point of view to understand
The Fool’s actions. But The Fool has roots in
tradition as one who is closest to the spirit
world. In many tribal cultures, those born with
strange and unusual character traits were held
in awe. Shamans were people who could see
visions and go on journeys that we now label
hallucinations and schizophrenia. Those with
physical differences had experience and
knowledge that the average person could not
understand. The Fool is God. The number of the
card is zero, which when drawn is a perfect
circle. This circle represents both emptiness
and infinity. The Fool is not shackled by
mountains and valleys or by his physical body.
He does not accept the appearance of cliff and
air as being distinct or real. Image from: Mary

Which Tarot Card Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla